Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1002

reference
877-tree-1
name
1002
tree-preservation-order

undefined

877-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.040686 50.873467)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.040629 50.873461,-1.040632 50.873472,-1.040640 50.873482,-1.040652 50.873490,-1.040668 50.873495,-1.040686 50.873497,-1.040703 50.873495,-1.040719 50.873490,-1.040732 50.873483,-1.040740 50.873473,-1.040743 50.873462,-1.040741 50.873450,-1.040733 50.873440,-1.040720 50.873432,-1.040705 50.873427,-1.040687 50.873425,-1.040669 50.873427,-1.040653 50.873432,-1.040641 50.873440,-1.040632 50.873450,-1.040629 50.873461)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL